Home

Demanding Dollars For Our Data: Increase our “net” neutrality? Yes, please…
January 28, 2014

This ain’t no chocolate factory, Willy. And there is no
golden ticket.

We have all heard the recent news concerning the FCC’s “pending” decision and how it will impact the future of the internet. And The Glove only asks one question:

do we HAVE to capitalize everything?.

Seriously. Capitalization signifies individuality. Which, by the way, we enjoy here. However, the total and frequent capitalization of community-based, free willing, and truly free market driven entities inherently limits the ability to create without interference.

Think about television. People used to get maybe three or four channels. They wanted more. Technology advanced, and people bought cable. Then more companies opened as demand increased. Competition rose and products eventually became more affordable.

When the competition ceased in the early 2000s, leaving but a few Mega-Corps to run the media, we saw the manipulation of a market. And a market manipulated by any outside forces besides the consumers (and taxpayers) is a market that is not entirely free.

If the internet were truly a free market, the data and personal information of ours would not be a one-way transaction. If Mark Zuckerbook wants to sell our information to third parties or advertisements, we deserve a god damn cut. And a say in the negotiations of price.

What is certain is that throughout the world and throughout history, silencing free press has ultimately hurt free markets, and has not been sound economic or societal decision making.

Don’t believe us, then just look at the effects of censor-mongoring and limits in free press. China, North Korea, Russia. Should they be our contemporaries when it comes to dealing with media and press?

If our politicians on both sides want to preach free market rules, then we the people must preach that we must preserve the free press.

The internet is not television. It is a universal community. It is not simply a type of technology. In the 21st century, it defines technology.

If we stand for freedom, across all lines, than we should stand for net neutrality.

More for Readers:
For a few semi-related reads check out:

Times of India
Ukraine Gov’t Concedes to the People.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/europe/Ukraine-government-quits-in-concession-to-protesters/articleshow/29513114.cms

Teacher’s Strike in India
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/Teachers-hunger-strike-in-Panaji-to-clash-with-Iffi/articleshow/25520484.cms

National Journal
Politics of Net Neutrality
http://www.nationaljournal.com/technology/net-neutrality-becomes-a-campaign-issue-20140127

State of the Union 2014
http://www.nationaljournal.com/state-of-the-union-2014/when-states-of-the-union-matter-and-when-they-don-t-20140128

Aljazeera English
State of the Obama and Iran
http://america.aljazeera.com/watch/shows/live-news/2014/1/high-stakes-for-obamarouhaniinnucleartalks.html

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s